Congestive Heart Failure Disease Management in Medicare-managed Care

Published In: American Heart Journal, v. 154, no. 6, Dec. 2007, p. 1153-1150

Posted on on January 01, 2007

by Ateev Mehrotra, Barbara J. McNeil, Bruce E. Landon

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: In 2001, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services began 2 initiatives that encouraged Medicare-managed care plans to introduce congestive heart failure (CHF) disease management programs. Our study was designed to describe the use, structure, and content of these programs. METHODS: In 2003 to 2004, we invited the representatives of Medicare-managed care plans with >/=750 enrollees to participate in a survey by mail or telephone. RESULTS: Representatives of 120 plans, 84 (70%) responded. Of the plans, 92% had CHF programs, 45% of which were instituted in 2001 or later, and 42% of which were handled externally by commercial vendors. Vendor use was more common in large programs (>30000 Medicare enrollees) than in small programs (<15000 Medicare enrollees) (57% vs 24%, P = .05), in national than local programs (50% vs 21%, P = .03), and in for-profit than not-for-profit programs (45% vs 21%, P = .03). Although 87% of CHF programs focused on improving patient self-management, a smaller fraction engaged practicing physicians (eg, 23% provided feedback to physicians concerning whether care was consistent with CHF guidelines). CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare-managed care plans, there is widespread use of CHF disease management. However, the programs used primarily focus on patient self-management and not on engaging physicians on medication management and compliance with guidelines. Our findings raise the concern that these programs will not be able to achieve the quality improvement and cost savings previously demonstrated in clinical trials of CHF disease management.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.