How Can We Strengthen the Evidence Base in Public Health Preparedness?

Published In: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, v. 2, no. 4, Dec. 2008, p. 247-250

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2008

by Christopher Nelson, Ellen Burke Beckjord, David J. Dausey, Edward W. Chan, Debra Lotstein, Nicole Lurie

Read More

Access further information on this document at American Medical Association

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The lack of frequent real-world opportunities to study preparedness for large-scale public health emergencies has hindered the development of an evidence base to support best practices, performance measures, standards, and other tools needed to assess and improve the nation's multibillion dollar investment in public health preparedness. In this article, the authors argue that initial funding priorities for public health systems research on preparedness should focus on using engineering-style methods to identify core preparedness processes, developing novel data sources and measures based on smaller-scale proxy events, and developing performance improvement approaches to support the translation of research into practice within the wide variety of public health systems found in the nation.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.