Are We Prepared?

Using Reliability Analysis to Evaluate Emergency Response Systems

Published in: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, v. 19, no. 3, Sep. 2011, p. 147-157

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 2010

by Brian A. Jackson, Kay Sullivan Faith, Henry H. Willis

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The evaluation of government programmes designed to prepare for future contingencies is an ongoing challenge for analysts and public managers. Despite significant focus in emergency management, the existing approaches have difficulty linking preparedness inputs to their effect on performance at future response operations. Adapting techniques from the analysis of technical systems, an approach for assessing response reliability – the likelihood that a response system will be able to deliver response capabilities at or above a specific level at a future incident – is described. The approach bases evaluation on the systematic assessment of the likelihood and consequences of events that would disrupt operations and reduce response performance. By doing so, it provides a clearer method for assessing the cost effectiveness of different preparedness policies and evaluating the performance of past investments in preparedness programmes.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.