Are We Prepared?

Using Reliability Analysis to Evaluate Emergency Response Systems

Published in: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, v. 19, no. 3, Sep. 2011, p. 147-157

Posted on on January 01, 2011

by Brian A. Jackson, Kay Sullivan Faith, Henry H. Willis

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The evaluation of government programmes designed to prepare for future contingencies is an ongoing challenge for analysts and public managers. Despite significant focus in emergency management, the existing approaches have difficulty linking preparedness inputs to their effect on performance at future response operations. Adapting techniques from the analysis of technical systems, an approach for assessing response reliability – the likelihood that a response system will be able to deliver response capabilities at or above a specific level at a future incident – is described. The approach bases evaluation on the systematic assessment of the likelihood and consequences of events that would disrupt operations and reduce response performance. By doing so, it provides a clearer method for assessing the cost effectiveness of different preparedness policies and evaluating the performance of past investments in preparedness programmes.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.