How Does Context Affect Interventions to Improve Patient Safety?

An Assessment of Evidence from Studies of Five Patient Safety Practices and Proposals for Research

Published in: BMJ Quality and Safety, v. 20, no. 7, July 2011, p. 604-610

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2011

by John C. Ovretveit, Paul G. Shekelle, Sydney Dy, Kathryn M. McDonald, Susanne Hempel, Peter J. Pronovost, Lisa V. Rubenstein, Stephanie L. Taylor, Robbie Foy, Robert M. Wachter

Read More

Access further information on this document at BMJ Quality and Safety

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: Logic and experience suggest that it is easier in some situations than in others to change behaviour and organisation to improve patient safety. Knowing which 'context factors' help and hinder implementation of different changes would help implementers, as well as managers, policy makers, regulators and purchasers of healthcare. It could help to judge the likely success of possible improvements, given the conditions that they have, and to decide which of these conditions could be modified to make implementation more effective. METHODS: The study presented in this paper examined research to discover any evidence reported about whether or how context factors influence the effectiveness of five patient safety interventions. RESULTS: The review found that, for these five diverse interventions, there was little strong evidence of the influence of different context factors. However, the research was not designed to investigate context influence. CONCLUSIONS: The paper suggests that significant gaps in research exist and makes proposals for future research better to inform decision-making.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.