Human Subjects Protection and Research on Terrorism and Conflict

Published in: Science, v. 340, no. 6131, 26 Apr. 2013, p. 434-435

Posted on RAND.org on April 01, 2013

by Brian A. Jackson, Tora K. Bikson, Patrick P. Gunn

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.sciencemag.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The last decade has seen considerable expansion in research on terrorism and conflict. People have studied root causes, group behavior, and different approaches to counter such acts. When research involves human subjects, regulations require investigators and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) charged with protecting human subjects of research to address concerns about individual risk and benefit. Questions of justice and beneficence—core elements of the ethical principles underlying the contemporary system for protecting subjects—can be problematic where one party in a conflict is studying another. The authors discuss how current legal developments raise complications and may limit the ability of researchers to work on terrorism and conflict topics.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.