Factors That Encourage or Discourage Doctors from Acting in Accordance with Good Practice

Final Report

Published in: General Medical Council. 2013. Barriers and Enablers of Good Practice. http://www.gmc-uk.org/about/research/14145.asp (accessed June 13, 2013)

Posted on RAND.org on April 01, 2012

by Emily Scraggs, Laura Brereton, Jennifer Newbould, Samuel Drabble, Daniel Schweppenstedde, Celine Miani, Tom Ling

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.gmc-uk.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Doctors have a responsibility to ensure that patients receive a good standard of care and treatment, in a safe, supportive environment. Given the many influences on doctors' day to day practice, we need to increase our understanding of what factors may act as incentives or barriers to doctors meeting these standards in different healthcare settings. The question of why doctors adhere or do not adhere to good practice is the focus of this study, in order to improve understanding of the factors that may contribute to the failures in service provision that lead to poor standards of care. Investigations of recent service failures have shown that poor practice can arise at all levels – individual doctors making a poor decision, inadequate local systems and processes for managing aspects of health care or at a strategic level where the effects of policy decisions (such as the development of performance targets) can create an unintended negative impact.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.