A Pilot Study Comparing In-Person and Web-Based Motivational Interviewing Among Adults with a First-Time DUI Offense
Published in: Addiction Science and Clinical Practice, v.10, no. 18, Sep. 2015, p. 1-11
Posted on RAND.org on October 05, 2015
Read MoreAccess further information on this document at Addiction Science and Clinical Practice
This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.
BACKGROUND: Driving under the influence (DUI) is a significant problem, and there is a pressing need to develop interventions that reduce future risk. METHODS: We pilot-tested the acceptance and efficacy of web-motivational interviewing (MI) and in-person MI interventions among a diverse sample of individuals with a first-time DUI offense. Participants (N = 159) were 65 percent male, 40 percent Hispanic, and an average age of 30 (SD = 9.8). They were enrolled at one of three participating 3-month DUI programs in Los Angeles County and randomized to usual care (UC)-only (36-h program), in-person MI plus UC, or a web-based intervention using MI (web-MI) plus UC. Participants were assessed at intake and program completion. We examined intervention acceptance and preliminary efficacy of the interventions on alcohol consumption, DUI, and alcohol-related consequences. RESULTS: Web-MI and in-person MI participants rated the quality of and satisfaction with their sessions significantly higher than participants in the UC-only condition. However, there were no significant group differences between the MI conditions and the UC-only condition in alcohol consumption, DUI, and alcohol-related consequences. Further, 67 percent of our sample met criteria for alcohol dependence, and the majority of participants in all three study conditions continued to report alcohol-related consequences at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Participants receiving MI plus UC and UC-only had similar improvements, and a large proportion had symptoms of alcohol dependence. Receiving a DUI and having to deal with the numerous consequences related to this type of event may be significant enough to reduce short-term behaviors, but future research should explore whether more intensive interventions are needed to sustain long-term changes.