Measuring Success for Health Care Quality Improvement Interventions

Published in: Medical Care, v. 50, no. 12, Dec. 2012, p. 1086-1092

by Kristy Gonzalez Morganti, Susan L. Lovejoy, Amelia Haviland, Ann C. Haas, Donna O. Farley

Read More

Access further information on this document at Medical Care

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: The lack of a standard measure of quality improvement (QI) success and the use of subjective or self-reported measures of QI success has constrained efforts to formally evaluate QI programs and to understand how the various contextual factors impact QI success. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess how best to measure "QI success" by comparing self-reported and externally rated measures of QI success. RESEARCH DESIGN: We performed a retrospective evaluation that analyzed data on different measures of QI success for organizations after their staff completed the QI training. SUBJECTS: The sample included 30 organizations whose staff had received QI training during 2006-2008, and who had used this training to carry out at least some subsequent QI initiative in their organizations. MEASURES: We developed 2 measures of self-reported QI success based on survey responses and 4 externally rated measures of QI success based on outcome data provided by the participating organizations in addition to qualitative data generated from the interviews. RESULTS: We found some variation in the mean scores of the different QI success measures and only moderate to small correlations between the self-report and externally rated QI measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that there are important differences between self-reported and externally rated measures of QI success and provides researchers with a methodology and criteria to externally rate measures of QI success.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.