Cover: Development of and Field Test Results for the CAHPS PCMH Survey

Development of and Field Test Results for the CAHPS PCMH Survey

Published in: Medical Care, v. 50, no. 11, suppl. 3, Nov. 2012, p. S2-S10

Posted on Oct 30, 2012

by Sarah Scholle, Oanh Vuong, Lin Ding, Stephanie Fry, Patricia Gallagher, Julie A. Brown, Ron D. Hays, Paul Cleary

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate survey questions that assess processes of care relevant to Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs). RESEARCH DESIGN: We convened expert panels, reviewed evidence on effective care practices and existing surveys, elicited broad public input, and conducted cognitive interviews and a field test to develop items relevant to PCMHs that could be added to the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) 1.0 Survey. Surveys were tested using a 2-contact mail protocol in 10 adults and 33 pediatric practices (both private and community health centers) in Massachusetts. A total of 4875 completed surveys were received (overall response rate of 25%). ANALYSES: We calculated the rate of valid responses for each item. We conducted exploratory factor analyses and estimated item-to-total correlations, individual and site-level reliability, and correlations among proposed multi-item composites. RESULTS: Ten items in 4 new domains (Comprehensiveness, Information, Self-Management Support, and Shared Decision-Making) and 4 items in 2 existing domains (Access and Coordination of Care) were selected to be supplemental items to be used in conjunction with the adult CG-CAHPS 1.0 Survey. For the child version, 4 items in each of 2 new domains (Information and Self-Management Support) and 5 items in existing domains (Access, Comprehensiveness-Prevention, Coordination of Care) were selected. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for the reliability and validity of new items to supplement the CG-CAHPS 1.0 Survey to assess aspects of primary care that are important attributes of PCMHs.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.