Household Preparedness Is Not Enough

The Challenges and Opportunities in Assessing Community Readiness for Disasters

Published in: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, v. 19, Suppl. 5, Sep./Oct. 2013, p. S70-S76

Posted on on September 01, 2013

by Lori Uscher-Pines, Anita Chandra, Joie D. Acosta

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Question

  1. How should community preparedness and resilience be appropriately measured?

The public health community faces numerous challenges in measuring community preparedness and resilience. This study aimed to identify existing measures of partnership, self-sufficiency, and social connectedness, as well as gaps and opportunities in the measurement of community preparedness and resilience. To accomplish these aims, the study team conducted a broad environmental scan to identify a list of possible measures in these areas and then assessed these measures using a set of standard criteria and feedback from key informants. Results suggest that while there is great interest in quantifying community preparedness, existing data have major limitations. There is a need for more measures of organizational and network activity and measures in the area of community engagement and empowerment.

Key Findings

  • Existing data for assessing community readiness have major limitations.
  • Accurate assessment will require more measures of organizational and network activity as well as measures of community engagement and empowerment.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.