Evaluating Treatment Efficacy

Published in: Interventions for Addiction: Comprehensive Addictive Behaviors and Disorders, Volume 3 / Editor-in-Chief Peter M. Miller (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2013), Ch. 61, p. 589-597

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2013

by Sarah B. Hunter, Jeremy N. V. Miles, Susan M. Paddock, Elizabeth J. D'Amico

Read More

Access further information on this document at Interventions for Addiction: Comprehensive Addictive Behaviors and Disorders

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

In this chapter, we discuss behavioral treatment efficacy (non-pharmacological) for substance use. Because the design of a treatment efficacy study is one of the most important elements to consider when evaluating the quality of the study, it is discussed in the first section "Study Design Considerations." In the section "Analytic Methods to Evaluate Treatment Efficacy", we discuss analytic issues in treatment efficacy research, such as study drop-out, baseline differences between study conditions, and comparing outcomes across groups and studies. In the section "How to Interpret Results", we discuss how to interpret findings from both a statistical and clinical standpoint. In sum, this article represents current knowledge about designing and interpreting treatment efficacy research.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.