Reengagement of High-Need Individuals with Serious Mental Illness After Discontinuation of Services

Published In: Psychiatric Services, v. 65, no. 11, Nov. 2014, p. 1378-1380

Posted on on January 01, 2014

by Thomas E. Smith, Bradley D. Stein, Sheila A. Donahue, Mark J. Sorbero, Adam Karpati, Trish Marsik, Robert W. Myers, Doreen Thomann-Howe, Anita Appel, S. Essock-Vitale

Read More

Access further information on this document at Springer Science+Business Media

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Question

  1. Which individuals needing mental health treatment who have disengaged from treatment can benefit from active provider outreach?

OBJECTIVE: The study determined rates of reengagement in services for individuals with serious mental illness who had discontinued services. METHODS: As part of a quality assurance program in New York City involving continuous review of Medicaid claims and other administrative data, clinician care monitors identified 2,834 individuals with serious mental illness who were apparently in need of care but disengaged from services. The care monitors reviewed monthly updates of Medicaid claims, encouraged outreach from providers who had previously worked with identified individuals, and determined whether individuals had reengaged in services. RESULTS: Reengagement rates over a 12-month follow-up period were low, particularly for individuals who had been incarcerated or for whom no service provider was available to provide outreach. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroups of disengaged individuals with serious mental illness have different rates of reengagement. Active outreach by providers might benefit some, but such targeting is inefficient when the individual cannot be located.

Key Findings

  • Subgroups of individuals who need mental health treatment disengage from treatment at different rates.
  • Administrative data can help identify those who might benefit from outreach.
  • Re-engagement depends on individual characteristics, the nature of provider outreach, and the quality of the relationship between the individual and provider.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.