Using Medicaid and CHIP Claims Data to Support Pediatric Quality Measurement

Lessons from 3 Centers of Excellence in Measure Development

Published in: Academic Pediatrics, v. 14, no. 5, Supplement, Sep./Oct. 2014, p. S76-S81

Posted on RAND.org on September 01, 2014

by Courtney A. Gidengil, Rita Mangione-Smith, L. Charles Bailey, Mary Lawrence Cawthon, Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Mari M. Nakamura, Jeffrey Schiff, Mark A. Schuster, Eric C. Schneider

Read More

Access further information on this document at Academic Pediatrics

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore the claims data-related issues relevant to quality measure development for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), illustrating the challenges encountered and solutions developed around 3 distinct performance measure topics: care coordination for children with complex needs, quality of care for high-prevalence conditions, and hospital readmissions. METHODS: Each of 3 centers of excellence presents an example that illustrates the challenges of using claims data for quality measurement. RESULTS: Our Centers of Excellence in pediatric quality measurement used innovative methods to develop algorithms that use Medicaid claims data to identify children with complex needs; overcome some shortcomings of existing data for measuring quality of care for common conditions such as otitis media; and identify readmissions after hospitalizations for lower respiratory infections. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience constructing quality measure specifications using claims data suggests that it will be challenging to measure key quality of care constructs for Medicaid-insured children at a national level in a timely and consistent way. Without better data to underpin pediatric quality measurement, Medicaid and CHIP will have difficulty using some existing measures for accountability, value-based purchasing, and quality improvement both across states and within states.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.