Clinician Advice to Quit Smoking Among Seniors

Published in: Preventive Medicine, v. 70, Jan. 2015, p. 83-89

Posted on on December 15, 2014

by William G. Shadel, Marc N. Elliott, Ann C. Haas, Amelia Haviland, Nathan Orr, Melissa M. Farmer, Sai Ma, Robert Weech-Maldonado, Donna O. Farley, Paul Cleary

Read More

Access further information on this document at Preventive Medicine

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: Little smoking research in the past 20 years includes persons 50 and older; herein we describe patterns of clinician cessation advice to US seniors, including variation by Medicare beneficiary characteristics. METHOD: In 2012–4, we analyzed 2010 Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey data from Medicare beneficiaries over age 64 (n = 346,674). We estimated smoking rates and the proportion of smokers whose clinicians encouraged cessation. RESULTS: 12% of male and 8% of female respondents aged 65 and older smoke. The rate decreases with age (14% of 65–69, 3% of 85 +) and education (12–15% with no high school degree, 5–6% with BA +). Rates are highest among American Indian/Alaskan Native (16%), multiracial (14%), and African–American (13%) seniors, and in the Southeast (14%). Only 51% of smokers say they receive cessation advice "always" or "usually" at doctor visits, with advice more often given to the young, those in low-smoking regions, Asians, and women. For all results cited p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking cessation advice to seniors is variable. Providers may focus on groups or areas in which smoking is less common or when they are most comfortable giving advice. More consistent interventions are needed, including cessation advice from clinicians.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.