Episode-Based Approaches to Measuring Health Care Quality

Published in: Medical Care Research and Review, 2016

Posted on RAND.org on February 29, 2016

by Peter S. Hussey, Mark W. Friedberg, Rebecca Anhang Price, Susan L. Lovejoy, Cheryl L. Damberg

Read More

Access further information on this document at Medical Care Research and Review

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Questions

  1. Would reframing health care quality measurement on the basis of an episode of care—from diagnosis to treatment and follow up—provide a more comprehensive view of care quality?
  2. What quality measures would need to be developed in order to implement this framework?
  3. What challenges would need to be addressed?

Most currently available quality measures reflect point-in-time provider tasks, providing a limited and fragmented assessment of care. The concept of episodes of care could be used to develop quality measurement approaches that reflect longer periods of care. With input from clinical experts, we constructed episode-of-care frameworks for six illustrative conditions and identified potential gaps and measure development priority areas. Episode-based measures could assess changes in health outcomes ("delta measures"), the amount of time during an episode in which a patient has suboptimal health status ("integral measures"), quality contingent upon events occurring previously ("contingent measures"), and composites of measures throughout the episode. This article identifies a number of challenges that will need to be addressed to advance operationalization of episode-based quality measurement.

Key Findings

  • Although complex, episode-based quality measurement would provide a more complete picture of care quality than current approaches.
  • Researchers created five categories of quality measures to assess an episode of care: outcome, delta, integral, contingent, and composite.
  • Available measures could still be used, but new quality measures would need to be developed to address significant gaps within the five categories.
  • Challenges would involve developing consensus with providers and applying measures in real world clinical environments.
  • An incremental approach will be needed with substantial investment in quality measurement methods and tools, data capture, analytics, and process design.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.