Is Cohesion Within Military Units Associated with Post-Deployment Behavioral and Mental Health Outcomes?

Published in: Journal of Affective Disorders, v. 198, 1 July 2016, p. 102-107

Posted on on March 29, 2016

by Joshua Breslau, Claude Messan Setodji, Christine Anne Vaughan

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Affective Disorders

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Question

  1. Does greater cohesion among troops in military units reduce behavioral and mental health problems after deployment?

PURPOSE: Prior studies suggest that cohesion among members of military units has a positive impact on behavioral and mental health sequelae of combat deployment. However, these studies have not distinguished variation in cohesion across units from variation inperception of cohesion across individuals within units. METHODS: A sample of U.S. Marines was assessed before and after deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan in 2010 or 2011. Within-group centering was used to distinguish unit-level from individual-level associations of cohesion with four behavioral and mental health outcomes assessed after deployment: alcohol misuse, violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a positive screen for depression. RESULTS: Unit-level cohesion is associated positively with alcohol misuse (OR=1.86, 95% CI 1.05-3.29) and negatively with UCMJ violations (OR=0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.83) but not with probable PTSD (OR=1.00, 95% CI 0.60-1.6) or a positive screen for depression (OR=1.00 95% CI 0.58-1.72). Lower perception of cohesion relative to the other members of the same unit is associated with higher likelihood of UCMJ violations, probable PTSD and a positive screen for depression. LIMITATIONS: Data on all members of the studied units were not available. CONCLUSIONS: Distinguishing unit-level from individual-level variation in cohesion among military unit members reveals more varied associations with behavioral and mental health outcomes of deployment than have been reported in previous studies, in which these levels have been collapsed. Associations between individual-level variation in cohesion and mental health outcomes may result from pre-existing traits related to both perception of cohesion and risk for psychiatric disorders.

Key Findings

  • High levels of unit cohesion are associated with higher likelihood of alcohol misuse and lower likelihood of military justice violations after deployment.
  • Cohesion at the unit level is not related to mental health outcomes after deployment (probable post-traumatic stress disorder and positive depression screen).
  • An individual Marine's perception of unit cohesion is associated with post-deployment mental health outcomes.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.