Knowledge Development Report

Veterans' Employment and Training Services (VETS) Research Study Design

Published in: United States Department of Labor, Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) (February 2019)

by Jacob Alex Klerman, Andrew Clarkwest, Daniel Litwok, Zachary Epstein, Charles A. Goldman, William H. Waggy II, John W. Trutko

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Section 502 of the Jeff Miller and Richard Blumenthal Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improvement Act of 2016 (PL 114-315) requires a "longitudinal study of job counseling, training, and placement service for veterans." There are many ways to conduct such a study, but these options vary greatly in their cost, logistical feasibility, and capacity to provide conclusive evidence to answer the specified research questions. To address this requirement, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued Solicitation No. 1605DC-17-R-00019 for a design project. On September 25, 2017, DOL's Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) awarded the contract for "Veterans' Employment and Training Services (VETS) Research Study Design" to Abt Associates and its partners, RAND Corporation and Capital Research Corporation. This Knowledge Development Report summarizes what has been learned from key informant interviews and review of the extant literature. Crafting a study design that rigorously addresses all of the relevant research questions entails a number of challenges. The design must be based on a thorough understanding of the legislative requirements, relevant programs and services, prior research, potentially relevant data sources, and analytic options.This document's purpose is to lay the groundwork for developing such a design for a study that can answer those research questions in a cost-effective manner. This opening chapter discusses basics about the VETS programs: Section 1.1 provides a logic model intended to capture the influences on veterans' employment outcomes that the study design must account for. It is followed by a discussion of the structure of the remainder of the document (Section 1.2) and this project's capstone document, the Evaluation Design Options Report (EDOR) (Section 1.3).

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.