An Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Perspective on Social Simulation

New Data and New Challenges

Published in: Social-Behavioral Modeling for Complex Systems, Chapter 19 (2019). doi: 10.1002/9781119485001.ch19

Posted on on June 11, 2019

by Osonde A. Osoba, Paul K. Davis

Read More

Access further information on this document at Social-Behavioral Modeling for Complex Systems

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This chapter reviews the current state of the art in data infrastructure and artificial intelligence approaches that could be valuable for social and behavioral modeling. Among the newer machine learning methods, adversarial training and fuzzy cognitive maps seem to have particular unrealized potential. The chapter then discusses the troublesome theory-data gap: the mismatch between measurable data streams and meaningful explanatory theories to frame the data. The chapter identifies this issue as a key barrier to meaningful social and behavioral modeling. It then discusses the need to move from purely data-driven work to theory-informed work and to tighten the iterative loop between theory and data analysis. Closing the theory-data gap is a general problem. The chapter illustrates three example models that attempt to integrate theory-informed and data-driven modeling: a network model, a factor-tree model, and a fuzzy cognitive map model. The first model addresses meme transmission. The last two address the public support for terrorism. The chapter identifies key questions and challenges along the way. These are questions that a notional social and behavioral modeling research community will need to tackle as it grows.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.