Factors Explaining State Differences in Applying for a Recent Long-Term Care Program That Promotes Aging in Place

Perspectives of Medicaid Administrators

Esther M. Friedman, Regina A. Shih, Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, Virginia Kotzias, Jessica Phillips, Daniel Siconolfi, Debra Saliba

ResearchPosted on rand.org Aug 4, 2020Published in: Journal of Applied Gerontology (2020). doi: 10.1177/0733464820924510

Older adults in need of assistance often prefer to remain at home rather than receive care in an institution. To meet these preferences, Medicaid invited states to apply for the Balancing Incentive Program (BIP), a program intended to "rebalance" Medicaid-financed long-term services and supports to Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS). However, only about half of eligible states applied. We interviewed Medicaid administrators to explore why some states applied for BIP whereas others did not. Supportive state leadership and the presence of other programs supporting community-based care were positively related to BIP application. Opposing policy priorities and programs competing for similar resources were negatively related to BIP application. Because states most likely to apply already had policy goals and programs supporting HCBS, BIP may inadvertently widen disparities across states, pushing those on the margins ahead and leaving the ones that are worst off in HCBS support to fall even further behind.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: Sage Journals
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2020
  • Pages: 8
  • Document Number: EP-68239

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.