Response Changes in Delphi Processes

Why Is It Important to Provide High-Quality Feedback to Delphi Participants?

Published in: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Volume 125, pages 160–161 (September 2020). doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.029

Posted on RAND.org on September 24, 2020

by Dmitry Khodyakov, Christine Chen

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This analysis examined the importance of quality feedback in Delphi processes. The findings: 1) showed that participants in Delphi studies tend to change at least some of their responses after group feedback and discussion; 2) illustrated that iterative data collection helps build consensus; 3) supported previous findings about the modest magnitude of response changes between Delphi rounds; and 4) suggested that even modest changes may affect the final study findings.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.