Reliable and Valid Survey-Based Measures to Assess Quality of Care in Home-Based Serious Illness Programs

Published in: Journal of Palliative Medicine (2021). doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0424

Posted on RAND.org on January 25, 2022

by Rebecca Anhang Price, Melissa A. Bradley, Feifei Ye, Danielle Schlang, Maria DeYoreo, Paul Cleary, Marc N. Elliott, Cheryl K. Montemayor, Martha J. Timmer, Anagha Alka Tolpadi, et al.

Read More

Access further information on this document at Mary Ann Liebert, Inc

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Background

There is a pressing need for standardized measures to assess the quality of home-based serious illness care. Currently, there are no validated quality measures that are specific to home-based serious illness programs (SIPs) and the unique needs of their patients.

Objective

To develop and evaluate standardized survey-based measures of serious illness care experiences for assessing and comparing quality of home-based serious illness care programs.

Methods

From October 2019 through January 2020, we administered a survey to patients who received care from 32 home-based SIPs across the United States. Using the 2263 survey responses, we assessed item performance and constructed composite measures via factor analysis, evaluated item-scale correlations, estimated reliability, and examined validity by regressing overall ratings and willingness to recommend care on each composite.

Results

The overall survey response rate was 36%. Confirmatory factor analyses supported five composite quality measures: Communication, Care Coordination, Help for Symptoms, Planning for Care, and Support for Family and Friends. Cronbach's alpha estimates for the composite measures ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, indicating adequate internal consistency in assessing their underlying constructs. Interprogram reliability ranged from 0.67 to 0.80 at 100 completed surveys per measure, meeting common standards for distinguishing between programs' performance. Together, the composites explained 45% of the variance in patients' overall care ratings. Communication, Care Coordination, and Planning for Care were the strongest predictors of overall ratings.

Conclusion

Our analyses provide evidence of the feasibility, reliability, and validity of proposed survey-based measures to assess the quality of home-based serious illness care from the perspective of patients and their families.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.