Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common

Nabeel Qureshi, Denise D. Quigley

ResearchPosted on rand.org Aug 1, 2024Published in: American Journal of Medical Quality, Volume 39, Issue 4, pages 188-196 (July/August 2024). DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197

The Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Innovations Exchange (IE) was developed to collect and report on innovative approaches to improving health care. The team reviewed 348 IE innovations including patient-reported satisfaction or experience measures. Innovations most often measured overall rating of care (61% of innovations), followed by access (52%) and provider-patient communication (12%). More than half used patient satisfaction surveys (n = 187) rather than patient experience surveys (n = 64). Innovations using patient experience surveys more often measured specific aspects of patient care, for example, access, versus a general overall rating of care. Most innovations using patient experience surveys administered nonvalidated, homegrown surveys, with few using the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality-endorsed, psychometrically-tested CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. The most common study design was postimplementation-only (65%), highlighting that methodological rigor used to assess patient-centeredness in the IE is low. Broad use of patient experience surveys and more rigorous evaluation study designs has increased some over time but is still lacking.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2024
  • Pages: 16
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
  • Document Number: EP-70565

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.