DoD Should Maintain Both Organic and Contract Sources for Depot-Level Logistics Services

Frank Camm

ResearchPublished 1993

Discusses points that the Department of Defense (DoD) should consider in deciding where to obtain the logistics services needed to support the force: DoD could significantly improve the performance of contractors by using new criteria to choose and reward them. Effective, continuing competition among potential sources should simplify efforts to contract for logistics services. Federal policy governing source selection and contract content and management should be changed to allow greater reliance on contractors. Even with such changes, a fundamental review of DoD's contract-organic split is likely to find support for continuing a significant organic logistics capability.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 1993
  • Paperback Pages: 6
  • Document Number: IP-111

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Camm, Frank, DoD Should Maintain Both Organic and Contract Sources for Depot-Level Logistics Services, RAND Corporation, IP-111, 1993. As of September 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP111.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Camm, Frank, DoD Should Maintain Both Organic and Contract Sources for Depot-Level Logistics Services. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1993. https://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP111.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND issue paper series. The issue paper was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that contained early data analysis, an informed perspective on a topic, or a discussion of research directions, not necessarily based on published research. The issue paper was meant to be a vehicle for quick dissemination intended to stimulate discussion in a policy community.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.