An Acquisition Strategy, Process, and Organization for Innovative Systems

by John Birkler, Giles K. Smith, Glenn A. Kent, Robert V. Johnson


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback88 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

Critics of the weapon-system acquisition process rarely address the question of how to achieve improvements in the process. examines some specific dimensions of improvement that are needed and suggestsa broad strategy for achieving those improvements.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One


  • Chapter Two

    A Strategy for Developing Novel Systems and Associated Operational Concepts

  • Chapter Three

    Creating and Choosing Options for Force Modernization

  • Chapter Four

    The Concept-Demonstration Path

  • Chapter Five

    An Organization to Manage Modernization

  • Chapter Six

    Implementing the Dual-Path Strategy

  • Appendix

    Funding Strategies for Accelerated Acquisition

This project was conducted in RAND's National Security Research Division.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.