Workers' Compensation Outcomes Differ Little at Self-Insured and Insured Firms: Raising Questions About Adequacy and Equity of Benefits
Jan 1, 2001
|PDF file||4.3 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|Add to Cart||Paperback118 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
Examines post-injury employment, earnings losses, and the adequacy and equity of benefits for New Mexicans with permanent partial disabilities, and compares the results to workers injured in four other states.
Background on Workers' Compensation in New Mexico
Measuring Earnings Losses and Replacement Rates
Adequacy of Benefits: Results on Earnings Losses and Replacement Rates in New Mexico
Equity of Benefits: Differences in Replacement Rates Across Groups of Workers
Comparing New Mexico PPD Outcomes with PPD Outcomes in Other States
Return to Work for Lost-Time Claims in New Mexico and Comparison States
Data Used in This Study
The research described in this report was performed under the auspices of RAND's Institute for Civil Justice.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.