Generating Electric Power in the Pacific Northwest
Implications of Alternative Technologies
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||0.2 MB|
|PDF file||0.1 MB|
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback82 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
The economic impacts of various combinations of technologies to meet future electricity needs. This report examines the implications of using alternative power-generation technologies to meet future energy demands in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. It concludes that 20 percent of the new electricity that will be produced by natural-gas-fired generation and by dams on the lower Snake River could be replaced by a mix of renewable energy (wind and solar power) and energy efficiency without much impact on the economy.
Table of Contents
Findings from the Analysis
Estimated Costs and Benefits from Removing the Lower Snake River Dams
Cost Breakdowns of Power-Generation Technologies
The research described in this report was conducted by RAND Science and Technology for the Pew Charitable Trusts.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.