Speeding Acquisition Reform in the U.S. Air Force
Jan 1, 2004
|PDF file||1.9 MB|
|PDF file||0.5 MB|
|Add to Cart||Paperback104 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
To identify barriers to implementing acquisition reform, the study team examined the incorporation of Contract Repair Enhancement Program (CREP) tenets in repair contracts at Robins Warner Air Logistics Center (ALC). The study attempted to link successful incorporation to various organizational levers-policies and practices senior leadership can use to influence individual behavior to achieve policy objectives. After a literature review, the study team conducted a survey at Warner Robins ALC to assess behaviors and attitudes toward acquisition reform, with emphasis on the organizational levers that existed during the CREP initiative. The team then developed regression models to explore the relationship between organizational levers and the number of CREP tenets incorporated in a repair contract. The team found that organizational levers can help explain contract measures of success. The results suggest that training in and fostering positive attitudes toward acquisition reform as well as effective teaming had consistent statistical relationship with contract innovation.
Main Findings and Implications
Repair Price and Negotiated Flow Day Differences in Warner Robins Alc Crep and Non-Crep Contracts
Interview Questions for Contract Repair Teams
Crep Survey Conducted at Warner Robins Alc
Organizational Lever Variables from Survey Data: Principal Components Analyses
Statistical Results of the Multivariate Analyses
The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force and performed within the RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.