Organizational Policy Levers Can Affect Acquisition Reform Implementation in Air Force Repair Contracts

Mary E. Chenoweth, Sarah B. Hunter, Brent R. Keltner, David M. Adamson

ResearchPublished 2004

To identify barriers to implementing acquisition reform, the study team examined the incorporation of Contract Repair Enhancement Program (CREP) tenets in repair contracts at Robins Warner Air Logistics Center (ALC). The study attempted to link successful incorporation to various organizational levers-policies and practices senior leadership can use to influence individual behavior to achieve policy objectives. After a literature review, the study team conducted a survey at Warner Robins ALC to assess behaviors and attitudes toward acquisition reform, with emphasis on the organizational levers that existed during the CREP initiative. The team then developed regression models to explore the relationship between organizational levers and the number of CREP tenets incorporated in a repair contract. The team found that organizational levers can help explain contract measures of success. The results suggest that training in and fostering positive attitudes toward acquisition reform as well as effective teaming had consistent statistical relationship with contract innovation.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2004
  • Pages: 104
  • Document Number: MR-1711-AF

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Chenoweth, Mary E., Sarah B. Hunter, Brent R. Keltner, and David M. Adamson, Organizational Policy Levers Can Affect Acquisition Reform Implementation in Air Force Repair Contracts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2004. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1711.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND monograph report series. The monograph report was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.