Air Education and Training Command Cost and Capacity System
Implications for Organizational and Data Flow Changes
ResearchPublished 2004
Implications for Organizational and Data Flow Changes
ResearchPublished 2004
This report examines the Air Force’s training management and decision processes to determine the need for data to support informed decisionmaking. It briefly reviews training management systems and associated organizational arrangements in the other services and the private sector to draw insights for a model management system for the Air Force. Impediments to training planning and management in the current Air Force organizational structure inhibit the flow of cost and capacity data and hinder effective decisionmaking. A four-level model of management is developed to evaluate the flow of data in the Air Education and Training Command (AETC) training pipeline. In the model, a corporate level validates and arbitrates training requirements; a strategic training management level concentrates on the training system’s long-term effectiveness; a training management level handles the day-to-day operations of training; and a direct training level delivers training in the classrooms. It is concluded that a consolidation of the strategic management functions would resolve many current data flow problems. Methodological tools, including simulations to evaluate tradeoffs in the training pipeline, should be developed to improve data combination and interpretation, particularly in the cost area. A minute-by-minute data tracking system would not be cost-effective, but cost and capacity data could be fit into the AETC Decision Support System/Technical Training Management System.
The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted within RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This publication is part of the RAND monograph report series. The monograph report was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.