Cover: Contractual Component Repair Policy

Contractual Component Repair Policy

A Key to Improving Depot Responsiveness

Published 1994

by Mary E. Chenoweth, John Abell


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback66 pages $13.00

The Air Force spends about 40 percent of its depot-level maintenance budget on contractual maintenance. This research documents an examination of the responsiveness of contractual repair of depot-level recoverables, specifically avionics components managed by the Ogden Air Logistics Center. The report outlines the major steps in managing contractual component repair, assesses contractual repair responsiveness in terms of repair flow times for a select group of components, and suggests what the Air Force might do to enhance repair responsiveness. Significant improvement might be achieved through (a) identifying a single office at Hq Air Force Materiel Command and each air logistics center with overall responsibility for contractual repair policy, (b) implementing responsiveness reporting and measurement, (c) improving materiel support to contractual repair, (d) developing contractual approaches that incorporate responsiveness incentives, and (e) extending the use of DRIVE (Distribution and Repair in Variable Environments), a methodology for setting repair and distribution priorities, to contractual component repair.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.