Government Accountability Office Bid Protests in Air Force Source Selections
Feb 22, 2012
Evidence and Options — Executive Summary
|PDF file||0.3 MB|
|PDF file||0.1 MB|
|Add to Cart||Paperback56 pages||$15.00||$12.00 20% Web Discount|
Recent bid protests have caused large disruptions in resource and operational planning in the Air Force, even leading to the cancellation of the Combat Search and Rescue helicopter program. Some tactics that the Air Force could use to counter such protests in the future include recognizing a bid protest as an adversarial proceeding, giving greater attention to how the Government Accountability Office views a bid protest, simplifying and clarifying selection criteria and priorities, explaining how its cost estimates are developed, involving attorneys in external review of bids, and gathering new data on the costs imposed by different forms of protests.
Tracking the Patterns and Trends of Bid Protests
Potential Proactive Defenses Against Bid Protests
The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.