Cover: Policy Analysis of Water Management for the Netherlands

Policy Analysis of Water Management for the Netherlands

Vol. IV, Design of Long-Run Pricing and Regulation Strategies

Published 1982

by Stanley Charles Abraham


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 7.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback190 pages $40.00

This volume is concerned with designing long-run pricing and regulation strategies that efficiently allocate the increasingly scarce groundwater (GW) in the Netherlands. Chapter 2 describes the methodology used, particularly the linear program RESDM that became an integral part of the strategy-design process. It begins with a nontechnical overview, and then describes fully the tactics considered. Chapter 3 begins with outlining the plans to use RESDM to carry out the analysis, then presents the results of those analyses. The special study that shows the expected net annual benefits to the nation of giving GW-extraction priority to agriculture or jointly to industry and drinking water companies is given at the end of the chapter. Finally, the conclusions, both about the methodology and the findings, are presented in Chap. 4.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.