Cover: A Conceptual Framework for Examining Teachers' Views of Teaching and Educational Policies

A Conceptual Framework for Examining Teachers' Views of Teaching and Educational Policies

Published 1981

by Linda Darling-Hammond, Arthur E. Wise


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback82 pages $25.00

Legislative and judicial policies that are intended to improve school effectiveness reinforce a legalistic conception of schooling, since they must be general, uniform, and enforceable. These policies seek to rationalize the actions of teachers by specifying curricular objectives and instructional methods for attaining them, and by measuring attainment. The theory is that if teachers conform their behavior to this model, more or better student learning will occur. Yet other theories of education are possible. In the "spontaneous" theory, the teacher is the central figure, directing the student's intellectual growth. In the "humanistic" theory, the student is the focus, with the teacher creating an environment to facilitate the student's development. If policymakers and teachers adhere to different views of education, educational policies may not have their intended effects while creating dysfunctional consequences. This Note explores teachers' choices of educational theory and how they cope with the dissonance if their theory differs from their school system's. The Note also proposes hypotheses to be tested.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.