Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback89 pages $30.00 $24.00 20% Web Discount

Assesses the quantity and quality of Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) services. Analyses of the Continuous Longitudinal Manpower Survey for fiscal years 1976-78 show that women are underrepresented relative to their eligibility in CETA's Titles II and VI. Independent of background characteristics, women are more apt than men to be assigned to classroom training activities than to on-the-job training (OJT) and to income transfer jobs than to jobs expected to produce unsubsidized employment. Although CETA is mandated to desegregate occupations by sex, CETA placed substantially smaller proportions of women who preferred traditionally male or mixed jobs than women who preferred traditionally female jobs in the occupations of their choice. Male CETA participants made consistently higher wages than their female counterparts in OJT and jobs, except in the professional and managerial occupations. The wage difference was greatest in OJT, even controlling on education and where both sexes are presumably equally inexperienced.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.