Market Response to the Government Regulation of Toxic Substances

The Case of Chlorinated Solvents

by Thomas W. Chesnutt


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback86 pages $30.00 $24.00 20% Web Discount

Under the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Environmental Protection Agency must oversee a wide range of chemicals that may harm humans or the environment. If each potentially toxic chemical were used completely independently of other potentially toxic chemicals, regulatory analysis of any chemical could ignore the effects of regulation upon other chemicals. Since users of a chemical can substitute other chemicals, regulatory analysis must account for the second-order effects of regulation on other chemicals. This study argues that implicit risk tradeoffs among chemicals occur repeatedly as the response of economic markets to government regulation. It recommends, therefore, that such tradeoffs be formally incorporated into the analysis of regulatory alternatives.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.