Market Response to the Government Regulation of Toxic Substances
The Case of Chlorinated Solvents
ResearchPublished 1988
The Case of Chlorinated Solvents
ResearchPublished 1988
Under the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Environmental Protection Agency must oversee a wide range of chemicals that may harm humans or the environment. If each potentially toxic chemical were used completely independently of other potentially toxic chemicals, regulatory analysis of any chemical could ignore the effects of regulation upon other chemicals. Since users of a chemical can substitute other chemicals, regulatory analysis must account for the second-order effects of regulation on other chemicals. This study argues that implicit risk tradeoffs among chemicals occur repeatedly as the response of economic markets to government regulation. It recommends, therefore, that such tradeoffs be formally incorporated into the analysis of regulatory alternatives.
This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.