Toward More Effective Drug Prevention Programs

Phyllis L. Ellickson, Abby Robyn

ResearchPublished 1987

This Note, an expanded version of an article that appeared in the journal California School Boards, discusses guidelines for developing drug prevention programs in the schools. The guidelines are based on the reported effectiveness of various prevention models, the developmental capabilities of different age groups, the patterns of drug use over time, and factors that affect successful program delivery.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
19 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1987
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 19
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: N-2666-CHF

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Ellickson, Phyllis L. and Abby Robyn, Toward More Effective Drug Prevention Programs, RAND Corporation, N-2666-CHF, 1987. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2666.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Ellickson, Phyllis L. and Abby Robyn, Toward More Effective Drug Prevention Programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1987. https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2666.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.