Medical Record Abstraction Form and Guidelines for Assessing Quality of Care for Hospitalized Patients with Cerebrovascular Accident

by Lisa V. Rubenstein, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Katherine L. Kahn, Marjorie J. Sherwood, Carol P. Roth, Caren Kamberg, Robert H. Brook

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback197 pages $45.00 $36.00 20% Web Discount

In an effort to contain health care costs, Medicare initiated a prospective payment system based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) in 1983. In 1985, RAND began a study to determine the effect of DRG-based prospective payment on quality of care for hospitalized Medicare patients. Six diseases (congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, hip fracture, pneumonia, cerebrovascular accident, and depression) were selected for study in each of five states (California, Florida, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Texas). This Note documents the medical record abstraction form and guidelines used to collect data from the medical records of patients hospitalized with cerebrovascular accident.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.