Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback37 pages $20.00

This Note is a primer on the use of Green Agent, the RAND Strategy Assessment Center's model of nonsuperpower political-military behavior in crisis and conflict. Green is a rule-based decision model written in the RAND-ABEL programming language; it is capable of simulating the behavior of more than one hundred national actors. It takes as inputs a variety of assumptions regarding the characteristics of each country to be modeled, and produces as outputs a set of decisions which, among other things, controls the actions of each country's military forces and governs access to its territory. The Note describes Green briefly, then details the parameters and variables whose settings and values constitute its inputs and outputs. It also discusses how to think about and use Green within the context of the RAND Strategy Assessment System (RSAS), and describes how to use various RSAS tools to access information about Green's activities. This Note is not intended as a reference manual for the model; N-2363-1 is available.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.