Cover: Naval Arms Control

Naval Arms Control

The Backdrop of History

Published 1990

by James L. Lacy

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback79 pages $25.00

This Note is one in a series of six RAND examinations of issues, options, and relevant considerations in East-West naval arms control. Other parts of the study seek to better understand what U.S. policy toward naval negotiations might be in the future by probing the strategic rationality and political desirability of alternative approaches. This Note is concerned exclusively with matters past — not with what U.S. policy ought to be but with what the policies of the United States and other naval actors have been in the past, why, and to what result. The discussion traces and explains major developments in the negotiation of naval limitations over the course of more than 150 years, placing particular emphasis on the experience since the turn of the century. Though the legacy is richest before the onset of World War II, the reconstruction of events continues through the postwar period to the mid-1980s.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.