Cover: The Baroque Debate
Read Online

The Baroque Debate

Public Diplomacy and Naval Arms Control, 1986-1989

by James L. Lacy

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback67 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

The public posturing of nations is not usually the best guide to the substance of the ideas upon which they disagree, or to the intensity and extent of their disagreements. In matters of naval arms control, however, the public record takes on special meaning. Neither the East nor the West has had much to say to the other in private that is at variance with public statements. This Note is the second in a series of six RAND examinations of issues, options, and relevant considerations in the naval dimensions of East-West arms control. It is concerned with one aspect in particular — the public diplomacy of naval arms control. The Note reviews the East's various naval overtures since early 1986, and the West's various public responses. It covers developments through early December 1989.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.