Cover: Modeling Heterogeneity in Susceptibility and Infectivity for HIV Infection

Modeling Heterogeneity in Susceptibility and Infectivity for HIV Infection

Published 1991

by N. Scott Cardell, David E. Kanouse


Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback19 pages $20.00

Models of the spread of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection must deal with substantial heterogeneity in the populations at risk. The virus is spread by behaviors that are far from uniformly distributed in the population, and substantial variations in biological aspects of susceptibility and infectivity are also likely. How adequately a model represents this heterogeneity will substantially determine its accuracy and usefulness for capturing the dynamics of the epidemic, making forecasts of future spread, and answering questions of policy interest. There are two main ways in which a model may handle heterogeneity: by partitioning the population into discrete risk groups that are in some respect homogeneous within groups but heterogeneous between groups, and by introducing model parameters to capture the effects of heterogeneity in a group or in the population as a whole. This Note discusses the dynamics of heterogeneity in HIV spread and develops a theory of heterogeneity in susceptibility and infectivity within a population that allows a simple representation of key phenomena within an epidemic model. The authors suggest that the effects of heterogeneity-related phenomena can be captured by letting two key parameters, the mean susceptibility over time of the uninfected and the mean infectivity of the infected, depend upon Y, the proportion of the population that is uninfected. (The mean infectivity may also depend on the cumulative proportion of the population that is removed through death or other causes.) Because Y is monotonic over time, this approach is general, and it allows considerable flexibility in the choices of functional form to fit available data.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This research in the public interest was supported by RAND, using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, and independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.