This Note evaluates a multidimensional model of self-reported health status in 1,980 patients with one or more chronic medical conditions. It hypothesizes two dimensions of health: physical health, defined by measures of physical functioning, role limitations, satisfaction with physical ability, and mobility; and mental health, defined by depression, positive affect, anxiety, and feelings of belonging. Physical and mental health were correlated but distinct, sharing about 20 percent of variance in common. Correlations of 11 other indicators of health with the physical and mental health constructs corresponded to a priori hypotheses. The authors conclude that self-reports of physical and mental health are distinguishable and that both constructs need to be represented for comprehensive assessment of health status.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.