Cover: Job Satisfaction Among Military Physicians Under the CHAMPUS Reform Initiative

Job Satisfaction Among Military Physicians Under the CHAMPUS Reform Initiative

Baseline Results

Published 1991

by Richard L. Kravitz, Neal Thomas, Elizabeth M. Sloss, Carole Oken, Susan D. Hosek


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback75 pages $25.00

This Note reports results from an analysis of the satisfaction of active-duty physicians with their military practices. Conducted as part of an evaluation of the CHAMPUS Reform Initiative demonstration project, the study measures satisfaction at baseline among physicians practicing in California and Hawaii and at matched control areas. Among their results, the authors found that (1) scores on the global satisfaction scale correlated highly with intention to remain in the military; (2) surveyed physicians were moderately satisfied overall, but satisfaction with some aspects of practice (e.g., professional abilities of colleagues) was much higher than with others (e.g., quality of clerical staff); (3) increased age, longer length of military service, Army or Air Force affiliation, recruitment by means other than scholarship, and pediatric specialty were significantly (p less than 0.05) and independently related to global satisfaction; and (4) variables indicating practice site were also significantly related to satisfaction, suggesting an effect of the local practice environment. The results also indicate that military physicians' satisfaction is particularly low with respect to only a few aspects of practice (salary, in clear and compelling terms the potential contributions)

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.