Utilization and Costs in the CHAMPUS Reform Initiative
Preliminary Results for April-September 1989
Download
Download eBook for Free
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 2.9 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback74 pages | $25.00 | $20.00 20% Web Discount |
In an effort to improve health care delivery and contain cost growth, the Department of Defense in 1987 proposed the CHAMPUS Reform Initiative (CRI). This Note presents interim results from an evaluation of the CRI, which was implemented in August 1988 throughout California and Hawaii to demonstrate major reforms of the military health care system. The evaluation is designed to assess the effects of CRI on a broad array of health care outcomes, including overall utilization and costs, beneficiary access to care and satisfaction, and treatment patterns for specific health care conditions. This Note provides preliminary data on health care utilization and costs under the CRI programs compared with those for the standard CHAMPUS programs in place outside the demonstration area.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.