An Analysis of Military and Commercial Microelectronics
Has DoD's R&D Funding Had the Desired Effect?
ResearchPublished 1991
Has DoD's R&D Funding Had the Desired Effect?
ResearchPublished 1991
This note analyzes commercial and military integrated circuits (ICs) to evaluate the efficacy of the military research and development (R&D) strategy during the 1980s. The analysis considers the market in which the ICs appeared (commercial vs. military), the orientation of the producing firms (systems vs. components), and the strategy of the firms (leader vs. follower). The study analyzes four groups of ICs: general-purpose microprocessors, digital signal processors, static random-access memories, and programmable read-only memories. Each group of products is analyzed on the basis of several characteristics, including density, speed, and price. An integrative analysis compares introduction times for military and commercial ICs. The findings indicate that commercial firms' ICs are either on a par with or ahead of comparable military components in the vast majority of cases. There is no evidence that the strategy of funding R&D to skip product generations resulted in a faster introduction of military ICs than did evolutionary development of commercial ICs.
This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.