Assessing Quality of Care for Hospitalized Medicare Patients with Hip Fracture Using Coded Diagnoses from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Files
ResearchPublished 1992
ResearchPublished 1992
HCFA developed a method for assessing quality of care for surgical patients using claims data. Coded diagnoses in the current or future admissions might indicate problems. The authors studied the validity of these methods by comparing actual bad outcomes in the medical record with bad outcomes defined by coded diagnoses in the claims, using data on 1229 patients hospitalized in 1985-6 with hip fracture from a previous RAND study. RAND's original study excluded patients with repeat procedures, so those codes could not be checked. For the HCFA codes that could be matched, the correspondence of codes to event in the medical record was weak, but some codes (pneumonia, hip joint infection and pulmonary embolism) were promising. Other codes, such as congestive heart failure, that might be bad outcomes were instead more related to history. Suggestions are given as to how the HCFA method could be improved.
This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.