The Effects of the DRG-Based Prospective Payment System on Quality of Care for Hospitalized Medicare Patients

Final Report

Katherine L. Kahn, David Draper, Emmett B. Keeler, William H. Rogers, Lisa V. Rubenstein, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Marjorie J. Sherwood, Ellen R. Harrison, Maureen F. Carney, Caren Kamberg, et al.

ResearchPublished 1992

In 1983, in an effort to control rising health care costs, the federal government established a prospective payment system (PPS) to reimburse hospitals for inhospital care of Medicare patients. Under PPS, hospitals are paid an amount based largely on flat rates per admission calculated for each of approximately 470 diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). This new payment system has been somewhat successful at slowing the upward spiral of Medicare costs. However, because PPS presents incentives to decrease lengths of stay and to substitute lower-cost services and procedures, patients, physicians, and policymakers are concerned that, despite the introduction of monitoring by professional review organizations, the quality of health care given Medicare patients may have declined under PPS. This report assesses the quality of inhospital care for Medicare patients age 65 and over, before and after the implementation of PPS, and estimates the effects of the PPS intervention on quality of care, by comparing quality of care now with the best estimate of what it would have been without PPS. Specifically, the authors describe the study's design, sampling, and fieldwork; discuss changes in sickness at admission following the introduction of PPS; consider measurements of the quality of care using explicit criteria before and after implementation of the PPS; compare changes in quality of care between 1981 and 1986 for five diseases as measured by implicit review; and discuss PPS and impairment at discharge.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
367 pages
List Price
$70.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1992
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 367
  • Paperback Price: $70.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-1220-3
  • Document Number: R-3931-HCFA

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Kahn, Katherine L., David Draper, Emmett B. Keeler, William H. Rogers, Lisa V. Rubenstein, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Marjorie J. Sherwood, Ellen R. Harrison, Maureen F. Carney, Caren Kamberg, Stanley S. Bentow, Kenneth B. Wells, Harris Montgomery Allen, David Reboussin, Carol P. Roth, Carole Chew, and Robert H. Brook, The Effects of the DRG-Based Prospective Payment System on Quality of Care for Hospitalized Medicare Patients: Final Report, RAND Corporation, R-3931-HCFA, 1992. As of October 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3931.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Kahn, Katherine L., David Draper, Emmett B. Keeler, William H. Rogers, Lisa V. Rubenstein, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Marjorie J. Sherwood, Ellen R. Harrison, Maureen F. Carney, Caren Kamberg, Stanley S. Bentow, Kenneth B. Wells, Harris Montgomery Allen, David Reboussin, Carol P. Roth, Carole Chew, and Robert H. Brook, The Effects of the DRG-Based Prospective Payment System on Quality of Care for Hospitalized Medicare Patients: Final Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1992. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3931.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.