A well-regulated bond market could help the Chinese government fund itself, help fund companies that could create the jobs China so desperately needs, and enable companies, pension funds, insurance funds, and social security funds to match their assets and liabilities properly. This would help stabilize China both financially and socially. Because China now has significant government debt, combined with a history of not letting that debt get out of control, it has the potential to develop a sophisticated government bond market that could become the foundation both for a large Chinese corporate bond market and, when the currency is fully convertible, for a regional bond market. The Asian crisis teaches us not only that Asian countries need bond markets to stabilize their finances but also that bond markets will be unstable without painful reforms to ensure rigorous accounting, transparency, strong bankruptcy and foreclosure laws, an effective legal system, and bank accountability.
This research in the public interest was prepared for the Center for Asia-Pacific Policy, a division of the RAND Corporation.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to help ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.