Download Free Electronic Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
The European Union (EU) stands on the threshold of a ratification process for a new constitution. At present, agreement of all EU states is required for ratification. As a consequence of disagreements over many aspects of the European Constitution, however, the future of the document is at risk. America once faced a similar challenge. The U.S. Constitution almost certainly would not have been ratified if agreement of all states had been required. This paper describes how the U.S. Constitutional Convention developed the "Rule of Nine" — that nine states out of 13 were needed for ratification — and briefly describes the state-by-state ratification process. Finally, it suggests that U.S. history may provide a relevant lesson for the EU.
This publication was supported by the RAND Corporation using its own funds.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to help ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.