Workers' Compensation in Pennsylvania: How is the System Performing? How Should It Be Reformed?
Mar 15, 2008
|PDF file||0.6 MB|
|PDF file||0.2 MB|
|Add to Cart||Paperback80 pages||$23.00||$18.40 20% Web Discount|
Pennsylvania’s workers’ compensation system was the subject of legislative changes in the 1990s and again in 2004 and 2006, changes that were partly a response to rising workers’ compensation costs over the preceding 30 years. In this paper, Greenberg and Haviland examine the performance of the commonwealth’s workers’ compensation system and the issues it faces, focusing particularly on benefits and compensation, workplace safety, medical care, and dispute resolution. The authors review the published research and the available data on workers’ compensation in Pennsylvania, and they supplement this review with qualitative interviews with a range of stakeholder groups in the state. Greenberg and Haviland find generally that Pennsylvania’s workers’ compensation system performs reasonably well relative to other states, but they note that the commonwealth may not be as strong in its performance on some safety measures. Greenberg and Haviland also note that Pennsylvania, like the nation as a whole, will continue to face the challenge of rising health care costs. The authors conclude with a series of recommendations for policymakers, emphasizing the importance of collecting more and better data on the performance of the workers’ compensation system, to inform the debate over future reforms and initiatives.
Benefits, Employer Costs, and Compensation
The research described in this report was conducted within the RAND Center for Health and Safety in the Workplace(CHSW) with a grant from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to help ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.