This paper explores the foundations of Air Force culture and outlines five cultural narratives that are tied to major moments in the Air Force's history, especially to critical junctures in the evolution of Air Force culture when the nation or the Air Force institution faced profound challenges. It argues that a single Air Force narrative is essential to serve the nation best.
Download
Download Free Electronic Document
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
Format | List Price | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Add to Cart | Paperback20 pages | $14.95 | $11.96 20% Web Discount |
Research Questions
- What is the Airmen's culture?
- Is there one unifying cultural narrative that underpins all others?
- Does total devotion to manned aviation shape Airmen's culture even at the expense of its larger defense responsibilities?
This paper explores the foundations of Air Force culture and outlines five cultural narratives that are tied to major moments in the Air Force's history, especially to critical junctures in the evolution of Air Force culture when the nation or the Air Force institution faced profound challenges. The author identifies five distinct cultural identities and argues that, as the Air Force has matured, these identities increasingly overlap and coexist. The first narrative describes Airmen's culture when aviation emerged as a revolutionary instrument of war in World War I. This, then, morphed into a narrative that marked the beginning of the modern Air Force during the interwar years. A third narrative describes a shift to the concept of victory through air power that occurred during World War II and recurred in the 1990s. A fourth narrative explores the Airmen's culture that emerged in response to the Cold War and the need to deter global nuclear conflict. A final narrative, which emerged during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, focused on the Air Force's enabling roles and shaped many of today's Airmen. The author points out that the fact that five discernible narratives exist suggests that a strong, single narrative that unites Airmen is missing. This absence encourages Airmen to create their own subnarratives and points out that senior leaders are missing an opportunity to imbue all Airmen with a unifying cultural identify that captures their value and place in a dynamic national security arena.
Key Findings
Airmen Lack a Strong, Single Cultural Narrative to Unite Them
- Individual Airmen tend to adopt a cultural narrative that best explains their own contributions to their Service.
- Absent a shared cultural narrative, Airmen often create their own subnarratives.
- Without a unifying narrative, cultural fragmentation will continue and the Air Force will suboptimize what it provides the nation.
Recommendations
- Senior leaders need to stay focused on the problems they are trying to address on the nation's behalf and leverage Airmen's innovative culture to help address those problems.
- Senior Air Force leaders should look for ways to highlight military innovation as a vital part of the Air Force's cultural heritage.
- These leaders should emphasize Airmen's cultural heritage at all levels of Airmen's education and training programs.
- Curricula and other programs should be restructured to recognize those who brought about innovations as well as those who operationally employed them.
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to help ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.